International Research journal of Management Science and Technology

  ISSN 2250 - 1959 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9367 (Print) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMST

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 79    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

FACULTY ENGAGEMENT AND STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE A THEORITICAL ANALYSIS

    2 Author(s):  M. MEERA, DR. P. RAVI

Vol -  8, Issue- 11 ,         Page(s) : 250 - 258  (2017 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMST

Abstract

The faculty engagement is all a vital necessity as for an obtainment: thus, the engagement alone and nothing else can win the students obtain. This particular faculty engagement as related to the students’ obtainment here in is dealt at a length as in a guise of a paper. And the engagement on behalf of the faculty is nothing but an attachment toward the academy and the students: which attachment, in turn, is nothing but a true dedication feasible.

1. To be engaged or not to be engaged: The antecedents and consequences of service employee engagement, Journal, Volume 66, Issue 11, November 2013, Pages 2163–2170
2. Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement, article first published online: 5 OCT 2013, DOI: 10.1111/joop.12041, Kimberley Breevaart, Arnold Bakker,JørnHetland, EvangeliaDemerouti,Olav K. Olsen andRoar Espevik
3. Putting twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success, article first published online: 1 MAR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01284.x, © 2012 The Authors. British Journal of Educational Technology © 2012 BERA, Reynol Junco, C. Michael ElavskyandGreg Heiberger, British Journal of Educational Technology, Volume 44, Issue 2, pages 273–287, March 2013.
4. Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance, Lorena Blasco-Arcas , Isabel Buil ,Blanca Hernández-Ortega, , F. Javier Sese, Computers & Education, Volume 62, March 2013, Pages 102–110
5. The Internet and Higher Education, Volume 18, Pages 1-68 
July 2013, Blended Learning in Higher Education: Policy and Implementation Issues, Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative ,  pages 38-46, Ron Owston , Dennis York, Susan Murtha
6. Student perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships, Joanna Bates1, Jill Konkin2, Carol Suddards3, Sarah Dobson1 andDan Pratt, Article first published online: 12 MAR 2013, DOI: 10.1111/medu.12087, © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013, Medical Education ,Volume 47, Issue 4, pages 362–374, April 2013
7. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, www.ncolr.org/jiol,Volume 12, Number 1, Spring 2013,ISSN: 1541-4914,17,Using Learning Analytics to Predict (and Improve) Student Success: A Faculty Perspective, Beth Dietz-Uhler& Janet E. Hurn, Miami University 
8.Education, November 2013, Volume 2, Issue 5-6, pp 264-275,Date: 14 Sep 2013,Key factors in work engagement and job motivation of teaching faculty at a university medical centre, B. A. M. van den Berg, Arnold B. Bakker, Th. J. ten Cate
9.Impacts of Curricular Change: Implications from 8 Years of Data in Introductory Physics, Steven J. Pollock and Noah Finkelstein, Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309 USA) ,2013
10. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Volume 38, Issue 4, 2013, First-year students’ appraisal of assessment tasks: implications for efficacy, engagement and performance, DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2011.637156, Alf Lizzio &Keithia Wilson, pages 389-406, Published online: 17 Nov 2011

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details