International Research journal of Management Science and Technology

  ISSN 2250 - 1959 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9367 (Print) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMST

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 65    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

REASONS BEHIND SKEWED/IMBALANCE BILATERAL PATTERN BETWEEN INDIA AND CHINA

    1 Author(s):  COL. KULDIP SINGH

Vol -  8, Issue- 9 ,         Page(s) : 17 - 25  (2017 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMST

Abstract

The present study reveals that India and China are the two fastest growing countries of the world, the possibility of an economic rapprochement among them to seize the synergies of their development is an important issue for research. Both the countries have witnessed transitions in their economic policies during the last two-three decades and the irreversible nature of economic liberalization has enabled each nation to integrate with the world economy. While analyzing the existing patterns of their trade and sectorial complementariness for further economic engagement, the comparative macro-economic performance of both economies may be examined in recent years need to be examined.

1. Arellano, M. and S. Bond (1991). Some test of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-299.
2. Athukorala, Prema-Chandra (2009). The Rise of China and East Asian Export Performance: Is the Crowding-Out Fear Warranted?. The World Economy, 32(2), 234-266.
3. Bagnai, Alberto (2009).The role of China in global external imbalances: Some future evidences. Economic Review, 20 (3), 508-526.
4. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Mohtadi, H., and Shabsigh, G. (1991). Exports, growth and causality in LDCs: A re-examination. Journal of Development Economics, 36, 405–415.
5. Bair, J. and E. Dussel Peters (2006). Global Commodity Chains and Endogenous Growth: Export Dynamism and Development in Mexico and Hoduras World Development, 34(2), 203-221.
6. Balance, R. H., H. Forstner and T. Murray (1987). Consistency Tests of Alternative Measures of Comparative Advantage. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 157-61.
7. Balassa, B. (1965).Trade Liberalisation and Revealed’ Comparative Advantage. The Manchester School, 33, 99-123.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details